Optimizing Logistics Networks with Integrated Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Authors

  • Szabolcs Szentesi
  • Gábor Nagy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32971/als.2025.006

Keywords:

sustainability, logistics, Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

Optimizing logistics networks today presents increasing challenges for companies, particularly due to the need to integrate sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR). The aim of this research is to explore the strategies and methods through which the efficiency of logistics processes can be improved while reducing environmental and social burdens. Guided by the principles of sustainability, there is growing emphasis on green logistics solutions, such as low-emission transport modes, energy-efficient warehouse management systems, and intelligent route optimization. In addition, integrating CSR principles into logistics decision-making contributes to increased social responsibility, for example through ethical sourcing, ensuring employee well-being, and supporting community development programs. This study examines how sustainability considerations and CSR can be embedded into logistics network optimization processes without causing significant deterioration in costs or service levels  The analysis covers best practices applied by companies, as well as the challenges and limitations associated with implementing sustainable and responsible logistics strategies. The findings of the study can contribute to enhancing corporate competitiveness by demonstrating the successful integration of CSR and sustainability principles into logistics processes. Optimized and responsible logistics networks not only mitigate environmental and social impacts, but also offer long-term economic benefits for companies.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

Szentesi, S., & Nagy, G. (2025). Optimizing Logistics Networks with Integrated Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Advanced Logistic Systems - Theory and Practice, 19(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.32971/als.2025.006